On March 21, 2016, Robert Piper, the UN Coordinator for Humanitarian Assistance and Development Aid for the occupied Palestinian territory (yes, that’s an actual title), condemned an arson attack in Judea and Samaria/ East of the Green Line (EGL)/ the “West Bank” in which no one was injured. Without any evidence, he called out the Jews:
“I strongly condemn today’s arson attack by suspected Jewish extremists on the home of Palestinian Ibrahim Dawabsheh in the occupied West Bank village of Duma. Mr. Dawabsheh and his wife were at home during the attack and sustained light injuries as a result of smoke inhalation. I wish them both a full and speedy recovery.”
As it turns out, the blaze was set by Palestinian Arabs who tried to frame Israelis. The person who fabricated the story is now in police custody. Oops.
The UN does not waste a moment in vilifying Jews, even when there’s no supporting evidence. Incidents and allegations are opportunities to validate their opinion that all of the problems in the region stem from Jews living in homes that they purchased.
Meanwhile, the United Nations never calls out Muslim terrorists.
When Muslim terrorists killed five members of the Fogel family while they slept in their home, the UN condemned the attack, but never referred to the attackers as “Muslims” or “Palestinian Arabs.” It never even called the attack “terrorism.” However, when an arson attack killed three Palestinian Arabs a few miles away, the UN called the attack “terrorism” three times and placed blame on “Jewish extremists.” That phrase seems to have a certain ring at the UN.
The United Nations singularly uses the term “extremists” when it comes to Jews.
On March 17, just four days before the UN jumped to conclusions and blamed “Jewish extremists” for a Palestinian Arab crime, the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki Moon addressed the UN Human Rights Council. He referred to his new “Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism,” which clearly spoke of violent extremism generically, and not tied to any religion in particular. In fact, the UN specifically tried to distance religion from the term “extremism.”
UN Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights Kate Gilmore said at the event that “selective application of the term “violent extremism” only to Muslim believers reinforces intolerance and discrimination.”
Kate Gilmore, United Nations Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights.
(photo: UN File Photo/Jean-Marc Ferre)
She would do well to look at the UN’s record, which only uses the term “extremism” in conjunction with one religion in the world: when it discusses Israeli Jews. She will then better understand the embedded “intolerance and discrimination” that Israeli Jews feel from the UN.
Related First.One.Through articles:
The United Nation’s Ban Ki Moon is Unqualified to Discuss the Question of Palestine
The Hollowness of the United Nations’ “All”
UN Media Centre Ignores Murdered Israelis
The UN Can’t Support Israel’s Fight on Terrorism since it Considers Israel the Terrorists
UN Press Corps Expunges Israel
UN Concern is only for Violence in “Occupied Palestinian Territory,” not Israel
Subscribe YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/FirstOneThrough
Join Facebook group: Israel Analysis
Reblogged this on Kattukse Vrienden voor Israël.
LikeLike
Oops! So Palestinians, who are responsible for the starting of the civil war in Lebanon, high-jacking of planes, killing US civilian on the cruise ship Achille Lauro, killing Israeli sportsmen during the Olympic games in 1972 etc. are not to blame for all the murders they have committed and are no longer terrorists?
LikeLike
Pingback: Thomas Friedman Thinks Palestinians are Crazy in the Margins, While Israel is Crazy in the Mainstream | FirstOneThrough
This women has a mental problem, anti-semitism.
LikeLike
Pingback: Ban Ki Moon Has No Solidarity with Israel | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Ban Ki Moon Stands with Gaza | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s Foreign Policy on Israel is like the United Nations | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Germans have “Schadenfreude” Jews have “Alemtzev” | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The UN Fails on its Own Measures to address the Conditions Conducive to the Spread of Terrorism | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: What’s “Outrageous” for the United Nations | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Goodbye Moon | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: 2016 FirstOneThrough Summary | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Trump’s Take on Obama’s “Evil Ideology” | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Regime Reactions to Israel’s “Apartheid” and “Genocide” | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The UN Does Not Want Palestinian Terrorists to be Held Accountable | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The UN Declares that Palestinian Arabs Should Not Show “Restraint” | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The United Nations’ Incitement to Violence | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Reviewing the Rhetoric of Palestinian Arabs and Israelis | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Reviewing the Rhetoric of Palestinian Arabs and Israelis | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The United Nations Can Hear the Songs of Gazans, but Cannot See Their Rockets | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: In the Shadow of the Holocaust, The New York Times Fails to Flag Muslim Anti-Semitism | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The United Nations’ Select Concern for Arson in the Middle East | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Select Concern from United Nations for Arson in the Middle East.
Pingback: The UN Never Demands Justice for Palestinian Killers | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Examining Ilhan Omar’s Point About Muslim Antisemitism | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: First the Attackers Were Radical Islamic Extremists | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Is Antisemitic Graffiti a Hate Crime? | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The Joy of Lecturing Jews | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The Joy of Lecturing Jews | First One Through
Pingback: The Press Are Not Guardians of the Galaxy | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: Victims of Preference | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: “Settlers” Now Means Jews Stepping Over The Green Line | FirstOneThrough
Pingback: The UN Talks About Jews Building In Jerusalem On Chanukah | FirstOneThrough