The UN’s Disinterest in Jewish Rights at Jewish Holy Places

On September 17, 2015, acting-President of the Palestinian Authority Mahmoud Abbas called out to Arabs who were fighting against Jews visiting the Temple Mount, the holiest place for Judaism, on Rosh Hashanah, one of the holiest days in the Jewish calendar:

We bless you, we bless the Murabitin (those who carry out religious war for land declared to be Islamic), we bless every drop of blood that has been spilled for Jerusalem, which is clean and pure blood, blood spilled for Allah.  Allah willing, every martyr will reach paradise, and everyone wounded will be rewarded by Allah.

The Al Aqsa is ours, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre is ours, and they have no right to defile them with their filthy feet.  We will not allow them to, and we will do everything in our power to protect Jerusalem.”

abbas video
Acting PA President Abbas called for Arabs to defend Jerusalem
September 17, 2015

These Arabs that Abbas was referring to, had brought stones to protest Jews visiting the Temple Mount and the ban on religious extremist who taunted and prevented Jews from visiting their holy sites.

The United Nations Response

The UN Security Council (UNSC) issued the following statement about the situation:

The members of the Security Council expressed their grave concern regarding escalating tensions in Jerusalem, especially surrounding the Haram al-Sharif compound, including recent clashes in and around the site.

The members of the Security Council called for the exercise of restraint, refraining from provocative actions and rhetoric and upholding unchanged the historic status quo at the Haram al-Sharif — in word and in practice.  The members of the Security Council called for full respect for international law, including international human rights law and international humanitarian law, as may be applicable in Jerusalem.

The members of the Security Council urged all sides to work cooperatively together to lower tensions and discourage violence at holy sites in Jerusalem.

The members of the Security Council appealed for the restoration of calm and called for full respect for the sanctity of the Haram al-Sharif, noting the importance of the special role of Jordan, as confirmed in the 1994 peace treaty between Jordan and Israel, and encouraged increased coordination between Israel and Jordan’s Awqaf department.  The members of the Security Council underscored that Muslim worshippers at the Haram al-Sharif must be allowed to worship in peace, free from violence, threats and provocations.  The members of the Security Council further underscored that visitors and worshippers must demonstrate restraint and respect for the sanctity of the area and for maintaining the historic status quo at the holy sites.  The members of the Security Council urged that the status quo of the Haram al-Sharif should be maintained and visitors should be without fear of violence or intimidation.

The members of the Security Council called for the immediate cessation of violence and for all appropriate steps to be taken to ensure that violence ceases, that provocative actions are avoided and that the situation returns to normality in a way which promotes the prospects for Middle East peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians.”

The response is outrageous and emblematic of Israel’s treatment at the United Nations:

  1. “Haram al-Sharif”, not Temple Mount.  The UNSC claims that it cares about the sanctity of the “holy sites in Jerusalem”, but it does not even mention the name of the platform, built 2000 years ago to ease access to Jews at the Temple. The platform is the “Temple Mount”- not mentioned once – while the Muslim name for the location is mentioned four times.
  2. Ignoring Arab incitement and Israel’s calls for peace. As noted above, PA’s Abbas called for Arabs to fight for Al Aqsa, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called for maintained the status quo of banning Jewish prayer on the Mount. Yet no specific UNSC rebuke of Abbas’s rhetoric was made in their call for calm, nor appreciation for Netanyahu’s call for calm.
  3. Special role of Jordan” mentioned, but what of the role of Israel? The 1994 Peace Treaty between Israel and Jordan called for the Jordanian Waqf to be the trustee of the Temple Mount, but security remained with Israel.  Why did the UNSC deliberately omit that Israel is in control of the security of the site and was deploying troops to stop Muslim extremists from attacking visiting Jews?
  4. “Muslim worshippers”, but not Jews. In case any of the language was not clear, the UNSC is solely concerned with Muslims on the Temple Mount. The constant attack on Jewish visitors gets no mention at all, even after mentioning the Jordanian-Israel 1994 Peace Treaty which specifically states that “Each party (Jordan and Israel) will provide freedom of access to places of religious and historical significance.

The UNSC voice of concern for: only Muslims and not Jews; using the Islamic name for the holy site, not Jewish; and referring to Jordan’s role at the site and not Israel’s, was clearly and specifically meant as a rebuke and warning to Israel and Jews. The most powerful global body told Israel on the Jewish New Year: do not mess with this Islamic site. Judaism is foreign. Jews are intruders.

Jews may protest that: the Temple Mount is its holiest site; that international law and treaties state that Jews have complete access to the site; and that Israel controls security on the site. Those facts are irrelevant to the UNSC.

The inversion of history past and present; provocation and reaction; rights and absence of rights has always been rife at the United Nations when it comes to Israel.  These days, as the world watches extremist Islam rampage throughout the Middle East, the UN will seemingly further prioritize placating Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and other Islamic extremists over the fundamental rights of Jews in Israel.

One can expect to see much more in the coming weeks when the UN circus comes to town.

Related First One Through articles:

The United Nations “Provocation”

The United Nations and Holy Sites in the Holy Land

Names and Narrative: CNN’s Temple Mount/ Al Aqsa Complex Inversion

The Waqf and the Temple Mount

Joint Prayer: The Cave of the Patriarchs and the Temple Mount

The Arguments over Jerusalem

Subscribe YouTube channel: FirstOneThrough

Join Facebook group: FirstOne Through  Israel Analysis

23 thoughts on “The UN’s Disinterest in Jewish Rights at Jewish Holy Places

  1. Today each one focuses on a specific international market to sell, namely: automobile, computer, food, technology, diamonds, high-tech, etc.
    Palestinian Authority leadership has specialized in something that can get billions of dollars: HATRED of Jews and the State of Israel.
    This proves to be a highly profitable business in which many, organizations and governments make massive investments…

    Joseph Rosen
    Author of ‘Why a Jew’
    ISBN: 9781616672300


  2. Pingback: Jordan’s Deceit and Hunger for Control of Jerusalem | FirstOneThrough

  3. Pingback: Visitor Rights on the Temple Mount | FirstOneThrough

  4. Pingback: Today’s Inverted Chanukah: The Holiday of Rights in Jerusalem and Judea and Samaria | FirstOneThrough

  5. Pingback: Squeezing Zionism | FirstOneThrough

  6. Pingback: The UN Fails on its Own Measures to address the Conditions Conducive to the Spread of Terrorism | FirstOneThrough

  7. Pingback: It is Time to Insert “Jewish” into the Names of the Holy Sites | FirstOneThrough

  8. Pingback: UNESCO Votes after only Hearing the Opposition | FirstOneThrough

  9. Pingback: Samantha Power Breakthrough: Violence Erodes the Prospects for Peace | FirstOneThrough

  10. Pingback: The Palestinian’s Three Denials | FirstOneThrough

  11. Pingback: Die drei Verweigerungen der Palästinenser | abseits vom mainstream - heplev

  12. Pingback: Time for King Abdullah of Jordan to Denounce the Mourabitoun | FirstOneThrough

  13. Pingback: Would You Rather Have Sovereignty or Control | FirstOneThrough

  14. Pingback: Time to Dissolve Key Principles of the “Inalienable Rights of Palestinians” | FirstOneThrough

  15. Pingback: The Hebron Narrative: Presence of Jews versus Presence of Israeli Military | FirstOneThrough

  16. Pingback: Israel’s Nation-State Basic Law is Not Based on Religion | FirstOneThrough

  17. Pingback: The Hypocrisy Between An Embassy for Israel in Jerusalem and East Jerusalem, OPT | FirstOneThrough

  18. Pingback: Not Remembering, Forgetting and Never Knowing | FirstOneThrough

  19. Pingback: There is No Temple Mount for The New York Times | FirstOneThrough

  20. Pingback: Does the UN Only Grant Inalienable Rights to Palestinians? | FirstOneThrough

  21. Pingback: For Chanukah, Arab League Shines Light On Why It Should Be Condemned | FirstOneThrough

  22. Pingback: Judaism’s Particularism Protects Al Aqsa | FirstOneThrough

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s