On February 27, 2016, the New York Times ran an article on page A7 by Diaa Hadid titled “Palestinian Fugitive Is Found Dead in Bulgarian Capital.” The article described how “a Palestinian man who escaped from prison in Israel more than 20 years ago was found dead outside the Palestinian Embassy in Bulgaria.” The piece described how “Mr. Zayed, 52, was sentenced to life in prison after he was convicted of the murder of Eliyahu Amedia, an Israeli yeshiva student, in 1986…. Omar Zayed escaped custody in 1990 after he went on a 40-day hunger strike and was transferred from prison to a hospital in Bethlehem, according to a statement by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a leftist Palestinian group to which Mr. Zayed belonged.”
Wow. The New York Times described the PFLP as a “leftist group.” Is it?
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)
The PFLP was founded in December 1967, and makes no secret about its enemies: Israel; the “World Zionist Movement”; and the United States of America. The inclusion of the USA is clear, as the PFLP states on its website: “In the battle for the liberation of Palestine, we are facing a third force, that of world imperialism led by the United States of America.”
The goal of the PFLP is the complete destruction of Israel through armed conquest from all sides. As it states in its manifesto written in 1969: “The armed struggle against Israel and all imperialist interests in our homeland, the expansion of the armed struggle front which stands in the face of Arab reaction and all imperialist interests and bases in the Arab homeland, and the encirclement of Israel with the strategy of the people’s liberation war from every side – from Syria, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and inside the territory occupied before and after 5 June 1967 – is the only path that leads to victory.”
Some of the group’s activities have included:
- Hijacking El Al plane (July 1968)
- Hijacking three planes (September 1970)
- The assassination Israeli Member of Knesset Rehavam Ze’evi (October 2001)
- Suicide bombing in a pizza store in Karnei Shomron killing three civilians (February 2002)
- Suicide bombing in a bus station in Tel Aviv killing three (December 2003)
- Suicide bombing in a food market in Tel Aviv killing three (November 2004)
- Killing four rabbis praying in a synagogue with axes and knives in Jerusalem (November 2014)
The PFLP continues to incite terrorism, as it praises attacks and calls “on all strugglers in Palestine to escalate the flame of the intifada.”
Due to its mission and actions, the US State Department labeled the PFLP a foreign terrorist organization (FTO) when it formulated such list at inception on October 8, 1997, together with the PFLP-General Command.
PFLP hands out sweets after the group claimed credit for hacking four Jewish worshipers to death in a Har Nof synagogue
And the New York Times decided to label this terrorist group a “leftist group’ rather than a terrorist group.
The New York Times Welcomes Arab Terrorism to the “Left”
The NYT is proud of its left-leaning ways.
Just recently, as the paper endorsed Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination for president, it considered that her challenger, Senator Bernie Sanders had fortunately brought the former Secretary of State further to the left: “[Sanders] has brought income inequality and the lingering pain of the middle class to center stage and pushed Mrs. Clinton a bit more to the left than she might have gone on economic issues. Mr. Sanders has also surfaced important foreign policy questions, including the need for greater restraint in the use of military force.”
Note that the Times considers the “greater restraint in the use of military force” to be a leftist ideal. Yet, somehow, the Times called a militant Palestinian Arab group, an organization which has led dozens of suicide bombings, murders and plane hijackings, a group which is a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) according to the US State Department – a “leftist group.”
Perhaps the greater restraint of military forces is a leftist ideal, only when such force is used by America and its allies.
If the right-leaning Wall Street Journal decided to label a terrorist group a “left-wing group,” presumably, many people on the left would be greatly offended. Aligning mass murderers and people who are sworn enemies of the United States, with the liberal cause would be called out as a libelous charge. Letters to the editor would pour forth from “progressive” pens denouncing the comparison.
But here, the left-leaning NYT opted to embrace the terrorist group as one of its own. It actively chose to align their political points of view.
The liberal paper has long declined to label Hamas, another Palestinian Arab group, as a terrorist group. The paper often uses soft language like “a militant group” or “an Islamist group” to portray that FTO.
In February 2016, the Times moved passed softening the image of Palestinian terror. It baptized and embraced Arab terror.
If this is the modern day version of being “progressive,” the entire world should loudly condemn it in every way possible.
Related First.One.Through articles:
Subscribe YouTube channel: FirstOneThrough
Join Facebook group: FirstOne Through Israel Analysis